British Occupation of India led to a Negative Effect

The British first entered India when it was on a lower floor the Mughal dominate in the novel 1500s and the archeozoic 1600s. The Mughal rule was uprise and so they openly welcomed these Hesperian traders. moreover by the 1700s, the Mughal rule evenfalld and the British East India pith (BEIC) had established themselves in India and at one time started taking over the lowly kingdoms that had formed. By 1820 they had control of virtually half of India. They converted it into a colony and treated the batch like their slaves. Due many negative effects of this imperialism the Indian public rebelled against the mightiest kingdom in the world of that time and successfully drove them out of their homeland. yet the British did have almost positive effect on India, although the negative effects reign the positive in its cadency greatly. When the British traders first arrived in India, the mighty Mughals did not fail threatened by them in any flair. But in the early 1700s the Mughal Empire started to decline due the lack of leading in the rulers and many otherwise small reasons. India was divided in to hundreds of lowly kingdoms and heres when the British do their move. By 1700 the BEIC, who had established itself in India and was totally detached from the British government, had hired their own unavowed armies of subjective Indian troop, called sepoys.

through the 1700s the British influence grow in India, because of two reasons, the madhouse in Indian authorities and the efforts of entrepreneurial traders. As mentioned before, by 1820 the BEIC had nearly half of India at a lower place its control. This phenomenon achievement by the British under a century was a result of tetrad reasons: superior technology, the chaos from 1740 to 1780 surface the way for British domination, the British were well organized... If you want to fixate a full essay, ordination it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper