Ode on a Grecian Urn and to a Nightingale Ode on a Grecian Urn draws out two different emotions. Firstly, felicity is drawn out, mostly due to the fact that Keats uses the word golden so many times. Upon reading the verse form again I invent hints of sadness when examining the urn. The beginning of the verse form is one of comfort and marvel as Keats asks what men or gods ar these, referring to the figures on the placement of the urn. Keats seems intrigued by the beauty of the urn and how foreverything on the urn may return entirely is ceaselessly imprinted on the slope. But when reading the poem over I see a different side of the poem. I imagine that Keats is second guessing the blessing of cosmos unendingized on the urn. The forever figures on the urn argon just a tragic varan of glorious times passed that may neer be seen again. As in lines 36-40 in which Keats states that citadels are emptied of people, streets are empty and unruffled and no one prov ide ever return. Another disappoint setback of the immortality of the urn is its repetition. Being imprinted with paint on the side of the urn in paint gives no life to the figures. They are detain in the position for all eternity with no capabilities.
Who would want an immortal life with the curse of being trapped when one could life a mortal life in effect(p) of free will, and excerpt making? Line 17 speaks of a lover who can not kiss his partner because he is stuck in position. Ode to a Nightingale is a tough poem to read. Keats is somehow thinned by the song that gives him pleasure. Keats may be jeal ous of the nightingale, possibly of the sim! plicity of... If you want to get a full essay, baffle it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment