'David Humes Thoughts On Empiricism Essay\r'

'One of the most not adapted figures in the history of western philosophy was Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was wide known for his views on Empiricism. Empiricism has been ponde trigger-happy since the beginnings of philosophy by many famous figures, from Aristotle to John Locke. (Wikipedia) Empiricism take ins that homophile knowledge is founded on observation and use of the 5 senses. Hume published a literary work name examination concerning compassionate Understanding. This had a profound equal on empiricist philosophy. (Heter)\r\nIn section 2 of the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, titled Of the Origin of Ideas, Hume makes distinctions about impressions and judgments. obviously stating how a memory obtained from the central nervous body dope never reach the level of raw, intensity that the original impression had made. An example of this concept fire be nearlything along the lines of experiencing free f entirely. We put up all experienced free fall at some set in our lives. Simply recalling that moment can never fully allow us to ambit the gut wrenching excitement of pure gravity.\r\nAn elicit thought brought forward in section 2 is The Copy Principle. Hume states â€Å"But though our thought seems to receive this unbounded liberty, we shall find, upon a neargonr examination, that it is surely limit inside very narrow limits, and that all this inventive power of the mind amounts to no more than the ability of compounding, transposing, augmenting, or diminishing the materials afforded us by the senses and concrete life experience…”(Enquiry, plane section II) In layman’s terms, imagination of the human mind might be perceived as limitless.\r\nHowever, in reality, it is sincerely a combination of sensory information and real life experiences. To this end, Hume believes that there be no genuinely original ideas. Everything we can conceive is a â€Å" repeat” or modification of material afford ed to us by our surroundings. Examples of this can be found all somewhat us. Such as the design of a rag matching the shape of a bird or Velcro behaving as burdock burrs. (Bloomberg) An raise point Hume brings to our attention is the screen door Man Argument. Hume claims that a some one born cheat has no notions of what trick is.\r\nIf you fit in that individual the ability to see, you present him with a pertly channel for ideas. Without this inlet, he would have no idea what pretense is. Therefore, color must come from the senses. (Enquiry, Section II) One might object to Hume’s imitate principle by stating that original ideas are created kinda frequently. A perfect example of this is the telephone. There was no object in the known universe that was able to transmit encoded sound waves through electrical wire over vast distances to a receiver forward the telephone.\r\nThis invention came into existence through pure innovation. The ruse man argument presents a n error. Just because a device man cannot make an association between the articulate red and the color red doesn’t designate that they have never seen it before. Perhaps the man has seen the color red countless times in his dreams. However, without having another(prenominal) individual identify the same color and uphold him form the association between the word and the color, the blind man will never know what â€Å"red” means.\r\nCountering my objection to The Copy Principle, all the natural resources we are afforded on earth can be combined, transform or restructured to create something else. Basically, everything we have created can be broken down to the raw materials found within our environment. This makes it impossible to create something truly new. The telephone is only if a combination of oil, copper, aluminum, silicone, ect. In defense of The Blind Man Argument, people born without the ability to see, claim they see â€Å"nothing”. They might under stand how the color spectrum works but they will never be able to sense what the actual color looks like.\r\nFor one to know the answer to this debate, he or she have the ability to see and be blind at the same time. Hume certainly brings up some interesting concepts. For this reason, scholars have been studying his ideas for centuries. Empiricism and rationalism are in constant disagreement. Both philosophical notions are extremely hard to disprove. Works Cited Hennighausen, Amelia, and Eric Roston. â€Å"14 bracing Inventions Inspired by Nature: Biomimicry: Nature as R&D Lab. ” Bloomberg. com. Bloomberg, 19 Aug. 2013. Web. 20 Sept. 2013.\r\nHeter, T. Storm. â€Å"Empiricism. ” First Philosophy: A Handbook for stock Philosophers. N. p. : n. p. , n. d. 15-21. Print. Hume, David. â€Å"Section II: Of the Origin of Ideas. ” An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. N. p. : n. p. , 1784. N. pag. Print. Wikipedia contributors. â€Å"David Hume. ” Wikip edia, The rationalise Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 30 Aug. 2013. Web. 21 Sep. 2013. Wikipedia contributors. â€Å"Empiricism. ” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 15 Sep. 2013. Web. 21 Sep. 2013.\r\n'