A Very Brief History on the Existence of God Essay -- Philosophy, Des

The subsequent essay will provide a brief overview on the existence of graven image from Ren Descartes through Immanuel Kant. First, section (1), examines Descartes establishment for the existence of perfection. Section (2), explores G.W. Leibnizs view on Gods existence in addition to his attempts to rectify the shortcomings of Descartes checks. The remainder of the essay thence examines two additional philosophers, David Hume in section (4) and Immanuel Kant in (5), who contend that Gods existence green goddessnot be rationally proven.(1)As a high-priced Catholic, Descartes undeniably commitd in God. He makes his faith clear in the garner of dedication preceding Meditations on First Philosophy. Here, Descartes writes that we must see in Gods existence because it is taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, conversely, that we must believe in the Holy Scriptures because they have come from God (Descartes, 1). Nevertheless, in the stem of the Meditations, Descartes casts doubt on e precisething -including religion- in his search for absolute certainty. In the threesome Meditation, he doubts the existence of God before providing his first rationalistic proof for the existence of God. In offering the proof, he first questions whether there is a God (25). However, even though he questions Gods very existence, Descartes maintains his naive whim of God. After some deliberation, he concludes that because he has an innate idea of God, (which is not fabricated by the mind or careworn from the senses), it must be God who endowed him with his innate idea. Descartes likens his innate idea of God to the mark of a craftsmen impressed upon his work similar to a stamp which says Made by God. Additionally, Descartes reasons that because he exists as a thinking thing and ... ...od to exist. As the above has illustrated, some(prenominal) Descartes and Leibniz believed that the existence of God could be proved via reason. But, Hume and Kant, which will be subsequently covered, did not believe argumentation or reason could establish the existence of God(3)David Hume attacks both Descartes and Leibnizs methodology for establishing the existence of God in the following there is an evident absurdity in pretending to demonstrate a proceeds of fact, or to prove it by any arguments a priori. Nothing is demonstrable, unless the irrelevant implies a contradiction. Nothing, that is distinctly conceivable, implies a contradiction. Whatever we conceive as existent, we can also conceive as non-existent. There is no being, therefore, whose non-existence implies a contradiction. whence there is no being, whose existence is demonstrable (Bailey, 79).